per-entity - Re: [Per-Entity] client software status
Subject: Per-Entity Metadata Working Group
List archive
- From: "Cantor, Scott" <>
- To: Tom Scavo <>, "" <>
- Subject: Re: [Per-Entity] client software status
- Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2016 21:27:53 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 164.107.81.214) smtp.mailfrom=osu.edu; incommon.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;incommon.org; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=osu.edu;
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
On 7/13/16, 12:48 PM,
"
on behalf of Tom Scavo"
<
on behalf of
>
wrote:
> The client software status page is starting to take shape:
> https://spaces.internet2.edu/x/SIL4BQ
I added a column covering the security models supported, as I think that's
where the traps are going to be with this.
With regard to ADFS, I don't think "configure a URL for every peer" that
happen to be MDQ URLs is really the same as "supporting" this. Supporting it
means you can configure a single base URL that the software will
automatically combine with the entityID to produce the right request.
So possibly we will need other columns to really accurately capture the
issues.
-- Scott
- [Per-Entity] client software status, Tom Scavo, 07/13/2016
- Re: [Per-Entity] client software status, Cantor, Scott, 07/13/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.