Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

mfa-interop - Re: [MFA-Interop] DRAFT not to assurance@incommon.org about an MFA entity category

Subject: MFA Interop Working Group

List archive

Re: [MFA-Interop] DRAFT not to about an MFA entity category


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Jokl, James A. (Jim) (jaj)" <>
  • To: "Herrington, Karen" <>
  • Cc: David Walker <>, "MFA Interoperability Profile Working Group" <>
  • Subject: Re: [MFA-Interop] DRAFT not to about an MFA entity category
  • Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 16:31:26 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US

Karen,

Yes, that makes sense.

Jim


> On May 9, 2016, at 12:28 PM, Herrington, Karen
> <>
> wrote:
>
> Good point, Jim. It probably wouldn't hurt to hint at recommended future
> work. I think I might suggest that the wording be "recommended future
> stronger MFA profile" instead of "likely.....profile", however, since we
> are not sure when or if that work will actually take place.
>
> Karen
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jokl, James A. (Jim) (jaj)
> [mailto:]
>
> Sent: Monday, May 9, 2016 12:20 PM
> To: Herrington, Karen
> <>
> Cc: David Walker
> <>;
> MFA Interoperability Profile Working Group
> <>
> Subject: Re: [MFA-Interop] DRAFT not to
>
> about an MFA entity category
>
> I too think that this is ready to go as-is. My one question is if anyone
> thinks that we should add a sentence near where we talk about the baseline
> profile and add in a "likely future strong MFA profile" to try to get
> across the idea that the whole picture in this space is likely include
> baseline, simple MFA, and strong MFA (and maybe more but I hope not too
> many more).
> Jim
>
>> On May 9, 2016, at 11:36 AM, Herrington, Karen
>> <>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Thanks for producing this draft. I'm satisfied with the suggested changes
>> and would like to go ahead and send this out. I want to be sure I am
>> sending to the correct email address. Can you provide that?
>>
>> Karen
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From:
>>
>>
>> [mailto:]
>> On Behalf Of David Walker
>> Sent: Friday, May 6, 2016 3:29 PM
>> To: MFA Interoperability Profile Working Group
>> <>
>> Subject: [MFA-Interop] DRAFT not to
>>
>> about an MFA entity category
>>
>> Everyone,
>>
>> As promised, I've drafted a note for the Assurance list about our
>> discussion yesterday of an IdP entity category to indicate MFA support.
>> It's a Google Doc at
>> https://docs.google.com/a/internet2.edu/document/d/1Cdc7MeQIyrTCCU4aVfbcSnad8_oqV-5jK902VqkZQUE/edit?usp=sharing.
>>
>> As we discussed, please respond with comments quickly so the final version
>> can be sent on Monday.
>>
>> Karen, we didn't discuss who would send it. It's probably best from you,
>> but I can send it, if you'd rather.
>>
>> David
>>
>>



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page