MFA Interop Working Group

["Jokl, James A. (Jim) (jaj)" <>]

Karen,

Yes, that makes sense. 

Jim


> On May 9, 2016, at 12:28 PM, Herrington, Karen 
> <>
>  wrote:
> 
> Good point, Jim.  It probably wouldn't hurt to hint at recommended future 
> work.  I think I might suggest that the wording be "recommended future 
> stronger MFA profile" instead of "likely.....profile", however, since we 
> are not sure when or if that work will actually take place.
> 
> Karen
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jokl, James A. (Jim) (jaj) 
> [mailto:]
>  
> Sent: Monday, May 9, 2016 12:20 PM
> To: Herrington, Karen 
> <>
> Cc: David Walker 
> <>;
>  MFA Interoperability Profile Working Group 
> <>
> Subject: Re: [MFA-Interop] DRAFT not to 
> 
>  about an MFA entity category
> 
> I too think that this is ready to go as-is. My one question is if anyone 
> thinks that we should add a sentence near where we talk about the baseline 
> profile and add in a "likely future strong MFA profile" to try to get 
> across the idea that the whole picture in this space is likely include 
> baseline, simple MFA, and strong MFA (and maybe more but I hope not too 
> many more). 
> Jim
> 
>> On May 9, 2016, at 11:36 AM, Herrington, Karen 
>> <>
>>  wrote:
>> 
>> Hi David,
>> 
>> Thanks for producing this draft.  I'm satisfied with the suggested changes 
>> and would like to go ahead and send this out.  I want to be sure I am 
>> sending to the correct email address.  Can you provide that?
>> 
>> Karen
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: 
>> 
>>  
>> [mailto:]
>>  On Behalf Of David Walker
>> Sent: Friday, May 6, 2016 3:29 PM
>> To: MFA Interoperability Profile Working Group 
>> <>
>> Subject: [MFA-Interop] DRAFT not to 
>> 
>>  about an MFA entity category
>> 
>> Everyone,
>> 
>> As promised, I've drafted a note for the Assurance list about our 
>> discussion yesterday of an IdP entity category to indicate MFA support. 
>> It's a Google Doc at
>> https://docs.google.com/a/internet2.edu/document/d/1Cdc7MeQIyrTCCU4aVfbcSnad8_oqV-5jK902VqkZQUE/edit?usp=sharing.
>>  
>> As we discussed, please respond with comments quickly so the final version 
>> can be sent on Monday. 
>> 
>> Karen, we didn't discuss who would send it.  It's probably best from you, 
>> but I can send it, if you'd rather.
>> 
>> David
>> 
>>