Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

metadata-support - Re: [Metadata-Support] Re: MDQ status?

Subject: InCommon metadata support

List archive

Re: [Metadata-Support] Re: MDQ status?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Cantor, Scott" <>
  • To: "" <>
  • Subject: Re: [Metadata-Support] Re: MDQ status?
  • Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2018 16:15:02 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 128.146.163.15) smtp.mailfrom=osu.edu; incommon.org; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=osu.edu;incommon.org; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=osu.edu;
  • Authentication-results-original: spf=none (sender IP is ) ;
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99

On 7/20/18, 5:50 PM,
"
on behalf of Nick Roy"
<
on behalf of
>
wrote:

> Interesting idea, but unfortunately it would break the systems that are
> doing the right thing, rather than breaking those that aren't, and might
> be an incentive to people to not verify the signature. Like you said, it
> would have to be non-production.

My point was for a system like that, "breaking" use of a test IdP doesn't
hurt anything.

-- Scott





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page