Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

metadata-support - Re: [Metadata-Support] MDQ format options?

Subject: InCommon metadata support

List archive

Re: [Metadata-Support] MDQ format options?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Poage <>
  • To: "" <>
  • Subject: Re: [Metadata-Support] MDQ format options?
  • Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 23:47:40 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) ;
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23:CTDlVx+omQK1Af9uRHKM819IXTAuvvDOBiVQ1KB32+wcTK2v8tzYMVDF4r011RmSDN6dtqkP07WempujcFRI2YyGvnEGfc4EfD4+ouJSoTYdBtWYA1bwNv/gYn9yNs1DUFh44yPzahANS47xaFLIv3K98yMZFAnhOgppPOT1HZPZg9iq2+yo9ZDeZwtFiCC9bL58Ixm6sQfcvdQKjIV/Lao81gHHqWZSdeRMwmNoK1OTnxLi6cq14ZVu7Sdete8/+sBZSan1cLg2QrJeDDQ9LmA6/9brugXZTQuO/XQTTGMbmQdVDgff7RH6WpDxsjbmtud4xSKXM9H6QawyVD+/6apgVR3mhzodNzMh8G/ZlNF+jL5VrhyiqRxwwYnaYICJO/RxcazQZs8aSnFEXspNVyxNHoGxYo0SBOQBJ+ZYqIz9qkMQoxu5AAmnGfnhyjhSiX/5w6IxzuMsER3I3Aw4GNIBqnvUo8vuOacPTe+60bPHzSvCb/NNwzvy9pXHcg04rPyKQLl+f83RyUw1GAPEiFWdsY3lPzWJ2eQKtmib6u1gVeS1h24gsQFxrT6izdovhInRno8Z107I+CZjzIooO9G0VFR3bNC6HJdKqS2WKo97Tts/T212uys20KAKtYCncCQQ1ZgqxQTTZ+GIfoSW+h7vSeecLDNiiH57eL+yiAy+/Eq6xuHiWcS51ktBoDBfndnWrH8N0gTe6siZRft5+UeswS2P1wXP6uFcP0w4j7fbJII8zbEqiJoTsF/DEjXol0rrka+abkQk+u625OT7erjqu4GQOoxuhg3jLKgihtazDOomPgQUQWSX5OCx2KXm/ULjQbVKivM2krPesJDfPckbuqC5AxdS0ok55BawESyr0MkEknYaNl1FZhOHj5PzN17QPf/4EO+zg06wnzdz2/DGIrrhD43MLnjFjLjherN960tbyAo119xf4IhUCr4YLPL2REDxqMbXAQIjPAyo2enrEc591p4GWWKXBa+ZKr/SvESM5uIuOOmMeJQVtCjnJ/gk4f7ukWE2mUUbfaa3wZsbdmq0Eep7LEWEMjLQhYJLFGoWtwY3UOWvk0CaSTlJe16zWak74zQ8DsShF4iJDtSojaCI0C6nF9hNe3heDUqQOXbufIKBXvAKLiWILZkyvCYDUO2dTIpp7RanuwKyn6ZpNu3d9SAwqJnv3cZ0/KvemQxkpm88NNiUz2zYFzI8pWgPXTJjhK0=
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99

Thank you both, Scott and Tom, for the clarification.

Right, there does seem to be no single answer. Use a self-signed certificate
to get around the 100s of CAs problem, and Wrong Thing deployers do the
equivalent of:

curl -k

and still don’t check the sig. Boo.

I sense there’s also not much middle ground (vs. dichotomy) to make it
relatively easy for Right Thing deployers to do just that, and to present a
semi-surmountable obstacle to Wrong Thing deployers to do, well, just that.

This does seem to make it clear to Wrong Thing deployers of their choice:
“Oh, you want the insecure version of that?” OK, wishful thinking. :-)

https://mdq.incommon.org:<port>/insecure

Tom.


Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page