metadata-support - Re: [Metadata-Support] MDQ format options?
Subject: InCommon metadata support
List archive
- From: Tom Poage <>
- To: "" <>
- Subject: Re: [Metadata-Support] MDQ format options?
- Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 21:26:11 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) ;
- Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
> On Dec 6, 2016, at 1:07 PM, Tom Scavo
> <>
> wrote:
...
>> http://mdq-beta.incommon.org/global/entities/foo?format=raw
...
> No, the current implementation does not support that feature but I
> agree that the first option (at least) is a perfectly reasonable thing
> to expect. The second option would be indistinguishable from an
> ordinary request.
Perhaps better that it doesn’t? I’ve been trying to find ways to get
unknowledgeable (and non-participating) vendors to obtain a
trusted/verifiable copy of our IdP metadata.
Many vendors, albeit understandably, refuse to download the InCommon
aggregate. Even if they do, understanding the content and parsing out our IdP
metadata, often by hand (ugh), and without even broaching the extra
consideration of signature verification, seems an insurmountable task for the
typical kind of support person on that end assigned to the task.
I’ve resisted self-publishing our IdP metadata (with or without local
signature, to varying degrees of success), so the MDQ server seemed a good
bet. Now to get them to take that small but oh so important step of verifying
what they download!
And, Ian, thanks for the additional explanation. Helpful.
Tom.
- [Metadata-Support] MDQ format options?, Tom Poage, 12/06/2016
- Re: [Metadata-Support] MDQ format options?, Tom Scavo, 12/06/2016
- Re: [Metadata-Support] MDQ format options?, Tom Poage, 12/06/2016
- Re: [Metadata-Support] MDQ format options?, Tom Scavo, 12/06/2016
- Re: [Metadata-Support] MDQ format options?, David Langenberg, 12/06/2016
- Re: [Metadata-Support] MDQ format options?, Tom Poage, 12/07/2016
- Re: [Metadata-Support] MDQ format options?, Klingenstein, Nate, 12/07/2016
- Re: [Metadata-Support] MDQ format options?, Cantor, Scott, 12/07/2016
- Re: [Metadata-Support] MDQ format options?, Tom Scavo, 12/07/2016
- Re: [Metadata-Support] MDQ format options?, Cantor, Scott, 12/07/2016
- Re: [Metadata-Support] MDQ format options?, Tom Scavo, 12/08/2016
- RE: [Metadata-Support] MDQ format options?, Cantor, Scott, 12/08/2016
- Re: [Metadata-Support] MDQ format options?, Tom Scavo, 12/07/2016
- Re: [Metadata-Support] MDQ format options?, Tom Scavo, 12/07/2016
- Re: [Metadata-Support] MDQ format options?, Tom Scavo, 12/06/2016
- Re: [Metadata-Support] MDQ format options?, Tom Poage, 12/06/2016
- Re: [Metadata-Support] MDQ format options?, Tom Scavo, 12/06/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.