Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

metadata-support - Re: [Metadata-Support] Re: [InCommon NOTICE] How to Protect Against Failed Metadata Processes [ACTION REQUIRED]

Subject: InCommon metadata support

List archive

Re: [Metadata-Support] Re: [InCommon NOTICE] How to Protect Against Failed Metadata Processes [ACTION REQUIRED]


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Cantor, Scott" <>
  • To: "" <>
  • Subject: Re: [Metadata-Support] Re: [InCommon NOTICE] How to Protect Against Failed Metadata Processes [ACTION REQUIRED]
  • Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 18:09:05 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 164.107.81.212) smtp.mailfrom=osu.edu; incommon.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;incommon.org; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=osu.edu;
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
On 9/22/15, 2:05 PM,
"
on behalf of Tom Poage"
<
on behalf of
>
wrote:

>I've been using recommendations "-Xmx 2g (or more)" on this page for
>some time:
>
>https://wiki.shibboleth.net/confluence/display/SHIB2/IdPProdJVMTuning
>
>Sounds like there's a different/conflicting recommendation for the IdP
>somewhere else?

All the container pages said 512M. I've never touched that page.

-- Scott


Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page