Metadata Distribution Subcommittee of TAC

[Tom Scavo <>]

We have a couple of questions regarding minor issues we've encountered
while rolling out the three new metadata aggregates:

1) The plan calls for the preview aggregate to be *identical* to the
production aggregate but the technique we're using causes the ID
attributes to be different. We don't think that's a big deal but I
wanted to ask and make sure.

2) What should be the content type of the metadata response?
Historically, we've responded with text/xml but we're guessing
application/samlmetadata+xml is preferred. The two content types have
different user experiences so we want to get this right out of the
box. What content type should we use?

Thanks,

Tom