Attributes for Collaboration and Federation Working Group

[Tom Barton <>]

I also like Ted's #3 best. -Tom

On 4/26/2018 4:48 PM, Nick Roy wrote:

The last one that Ted suggests seems the most accurate to me. Having the needed attributes removes a significant roadblock to getting this stuff to work in support of research.

Nick

On 4/26/18 3:42 PM, Ted Hanss wrote:

Great work, Kevin!

Can we say something about what it does rather than being important? E.g., 

“Reliable attribute sharing among federation participants makes research collaboration easy to set up and maintain" 

“Reliable attribute sharing among federation participants makes application integration easy." 

“Reliable attribute sharing among federation participants reduces the overhead work for research collaborations." 

On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 5:30 PM, Kevin Morooney <> wrote:

Duncan has enthusiastically agreed to be a researcher quotee.  It will be easier if I pitch something to him and have him adjust to his liking.  Let me know what you think about this and I’ll send it to him soon.

“Reliable attribute sharing among federation participants is critically important for the research collaborations in which I participate and lead.”

Given the other text blocks, I thought it would need to be short.

Let me know what you think.

THanks.

-kevin

-- 
Tom Barton
Sr Consultant for Cyber Security & Data Privacy
IT Services, University of Chicago
+1 773 834 1700 (w)

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature