Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

attributes - Re: Report from the Attributes Working Group

Subject: Attributes for Collaboration and Federation Working Group

List archive

Re: Report from the Attributes Working Group


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Nick Roy <>
  • To: "Christ, Bradley" <>, Emily Eisbruch <>, "" <>
  • Subject: Re: Report from the Attributes Working Group
  • Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 23:45:21 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) ;
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99

On 3/1/18 4:25 PM, Christ, Bradley wrote:
>
> * 1. Should a document repository ID be assigned?
>
> https://spaces.internet2.edu/x/UIDuBQ
>
>
> From the description, it sounds like we should get an ID.
>
>
> * 2. Will there bea community
> consultation?  
> https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/TI/Guidelines+for+Trust+and+Identity+Working+Group+Chairs+and+Flywheels#GuidelinesforTrustandIdentityWorkingGroupChairsandFlywheels-ConsultationforGettingFeedbackonProposedDocuments
>
>
> Personally, I would say no. We are providing some recommendations, not
> setting actual policy.

If you think this document will undergo a public consultation, it should
be in the document stewardship repo and have a document ID. I suspect
the recommendations should undergo a consultation once the group is
ready for that.

Best,

Nick

>
> These are just my thoughts, but anyone else wish to chime in?
>
> Brad
>
>
>
>
>



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page