Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

assurance - Re: [Assurance] Assurance and SHA-1/SHA-2

Subject: Assurance

List archive

Re: [Assurance] Assurance and SHA-1/SHA-2


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Scavo <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [Assurance] Assurance and SHA-1/SHA-2
  • Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 16:46:10 -0400

I blogged about this topic earlier this week:
https://spaces.internet2.edu/x/AYbYAg

Hope this helps,

Tom

On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Eric Goodman
<>
wrote:
> Thanks Tom!
>
> --- Eric
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From:
>>
>> [
>> ]
>> On Behalf Of Tom Barton
>> Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2014 6:01 AM
>> To:
>>
>> Subject: Re: [Assurance] Assurance and SHA-1/SHA-2
>>
>> Eric,
>>
>> Section 9 of SP800-131A clearly states that SHA-1 remains acceptable
>> for all non-digital signature generation algorithms.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> On 5/2/2014 6:37 PM, Eric Goodman wrote:
>> > [And to anyone still reading, I'm still interested in whether SSHA
>> > passwords in LDAP userPassword fields would still count as
>> > Silver-compliant.] --- Eric
>



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page