assurance - Re: [Assurance] Assurance and SHA-1/SHA-2

Subject: Assurance

List archive

Re: [Assurance] Assurance and SHA-1/SHA-2

From: Tom Barton <>
To:
Subject: Re: [Assurance] Assurance and SHA-1/SHA-2
Date: Sat, 03 May 2014 08:00:34 -0500

Eric,

Section 9 of SP800-131A clearly states that SHA-1 remains acceptable for all non-digital signature generation algorithms.

Tom

On 5/2/2014 6:37 PM, Eric Goodman wrote:

[And to anyone still reading, I'm still interested in whether SSHA passwords in LDAP userPassword fields would still count as Silver-compliant.] --- Eric

[Assurance] Assurance and SHA-1/SHA-2, Eric Goodman, 05/01/2014
- Re: [Assurance] Assurance and SHA-1/SHA-2, Tom Scavo, 05/01/2014
  - RE: [Assurance] Assurance and SHA-1/SHA-2, Eric Goodman, 05/02/2014
    - Re: [Assurance] Assurance and SHA-1/SHA-2, Tom Scavo, 05/02/2014
      - RE: [Assurance] Assurance and SHA-1/SHA-2, Eric Goodman, 05/02/2014
        
        Re: [Assurance] Assurance and SHA-1/SHA-2, Tom Barton, 05/03/2014
        
        RE: [Assurance] Assurance and SHA-1/SHA-2, Eric Goodman, 05/03/2014
        
        Re: [Assurance] Assurance and SHA-1/SHA-2, Tom Scavo, 05/09/2014
        Re: [Assurance] Assurance and SHA-1/SHA-2, Cantor, Scott, 05/09/2014
        Re: [Assurance] Assurance and SHA-1/SHA-2, Tom Scavo, 05/09/2014
        Re: [Assurance] Assurance and SHA-1/SHA-2, Cantor, Scott, 05/09/2014
        Re: [Assurance] Assurance and SHA-1/SHA-2, Tom Scavo, 05/09/2014
        Re: [Assurance] Assurance and SHA-1/SHA-2, Cantor, Scott, 05/10/2014
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [Assurance] Assurance and SHA-1/SHA-2, Joe St Sauver, 05/02/2014

List archive

Re: [Assurance] Assurance and SHA-1/SHA-2