Assurance

["Cantor, Scott" <>]

On 8/8/12 2:51 PM, "Joe St Sauver" 
<>
 wrote:
>
>My concern with employing that approach would be that it could easily be
>exploited for a trivial denial of service attack:

I've gotten exactly nowhere arguing that this is a problem. That's
somewhat reinforced by the fact that we've been doing it here for a while
with no problems. Are there actual examples of this happening?

The perspective here seems to be that the risk is low and the standard
network scans we do detecting unusual activity would slam down fast enough.

-- Scott