ad-assurance - Re: [AD-Assurance] Response to comments on the parent assurance list?
Subject: Meeting the InCommon Assurance profile criteria using Active Directory
List archive
- From: Ann West <>
- To: "" <>
- Subject: Re: [AD-Assurance] Response to comments on the parent assurance list?
- Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 16:10:25 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
Hi Eric,
My two cents: The notes should come from the developers of the doc, not InCommon staff.
Ann
From: Eric Goodman <>
Reply-To: "" <> Date: Tuesday, February 4, 2014 3:21 PM To: "" <> Subject: [AD-Assurance] Response to comments on the parent assurance list? Hi all, I’m just getting around to updating the “comments on the public draft” with the email comments and comments that we discussed last Friday. I feel like while we are putting together a response to the various comments, we should send some brief message to the list or to the two commenters (Warren Anderson and Robert Mackin) acknowledging their questions, indicating that we are
capturing them as comments on the draft and letting them know that responses will be forthcoming.
Any concern with me just doing that once I’ve copied their comments on to the comments page? And any preference between me emailing them directly, vs a response on the parent assurance list? I’m also happy for Ann or David (as our conveners)
to send said message, I’m just offering because I’m sitting down to capture (and draft responses to) their comments so our lack of response is sort of smacking me in the face just at the moment… --- Eric |
- [AD-Assurance] Response to comments on the parent assurance list?, Eric Goodman, 02/04/2014
- Re: [AD-Assurance] Response to comments on the parent assurance list?, Ann West, 02/05/2014
- RE: [AD-Assurance] Response to comments on the parent assurance list?, Eric Goodman, 02/05/2014
- Re: [AD-Assurance] Response to comments on the parent assurance list?, Ann West, 02/05/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.