Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

ad-assurance - [AD-Assurance] RE: Comment capturement

Subject: Meeting the InCommon Assurance profile criteria using Active Directory

List archive

[AD-Assurance] RE: Comment capturement


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Eric Goodman <>
  • To: "" <>
  • Subject: [AD-Assurance] RE: Comment capturement
  • Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 21:35:21 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US

Further followup:

 

Should Ron’s comment about bitlocker be considered a comment (in the public comments page I’m creating), or should I leave it off? I think that leaving it off is okay given (a) we decided he’d address via an AM (which we should add if an when it’s approved) and (b) Robert Mackin’s question about self-encrypting drives – which I’ve already captured – would seem to duplicate the essence of Ron’s comment anyway.

 

--- Eric

 

From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of Eric Goodman
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2014 12:26 PM
To:
Subject: [AD-Assurance] Comment capturement

 

More list noise:

 

On our previous drafts, we created a “comments” page, rather than collecting comments in-line (using the Confluence “comments” feature). I’m assuming this is what’s intended here. I don’t see any such existing page, so I’ll go ahead and create one. Please redirect me if there’s an existing location for these comments!

 

--- Eric




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page