ad-assurance - [AD-Assurance] RE: Comment capturement
Subject: Meeting the InCommon Assurance profile criteria using Active Directory
List archive
- From: Eric Goodman <>
- To: "" <>
- Subject: [AD-Assurance] RE: Comment capturement
- Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 21:35:21 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
Further followup: Should Ron’s comment about bitlocker be considered a comment (in the public comments page I’m creating), or should I leave it off? I think that leaving it off is okay given (a) we decided he’d address via an
AM (which we should add if an when it’s approved) and (b) Robert Mackin’s question about self-encrypting drives – which I’ve already captured – would seem to duplicate the essence of Ron’s comment anyway. --- Eric From: [mailto:]
On Behalf Of Eric Goodman More list noise: On our previous drafts, we created a “comments” page, rather than collecting comments in-line (using the Confluence “comments” feature). I’m assuming this is what’s intended here. I don’t see any such existing page, so I’ll go ahead and
create one. Please redirect me if there’s an existing location for these comments! --- Eric |
- [AD-Assurance] Comment capturement, Eric Goodman, 02/04/2014
- [AD-Assurance] RE: Comment capturement, Eric Goodman, 02/04/2014
- [AD-Assurance] RE: Comment capturement, Eric Goodman, 02/04/2014
- [AD-Assurance] RE: Comment capturement, Eric Goodman, 02/05/2014
- Re: [AD-Assurance] RE: Comment capturement, David Walker, 02/06/2014
- Re: [AD-Assurance] RE: Comment capturement, Capehart,Jeffrey D, 02/06/2014
- RE: [AD-Assurance] RE: Comment capturement, Eric Goodman, 02/06/2014
- Re: [AD-Assurance] RE: Comment capturement, David Walker, 02/06/2014
- [AD-Assurance] RE: Comment capturement, Eric Goodman, 02/05/2014
- [AD-Assurance] RE: Comment capturement, Eric Goodman, 02/04/2014
- [AD-Assurance] RE: Comment capturement, Eric Goodman, 02/04/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.