Meeting the InCommon Assurance profile criteria using Active Directory

[Ann West <>]

Thanks David.

On 1/7/14 11:49 AM, "David Walker" <> wrote:

The document is now in a public space:  https://spaces.internet2.edu/x/coW8Ag .

David

On Tue, 2014-01-07 at 16:31 +0000, Ann West wrote:

Ah yes…was thinking we would skip a week but we already did. Jan 1 fell on a Wednesday.

I'll send out a note about the call tomorrow. If you folks could put the doc in a public space, that would be great. 

Thanks

Ann

On 1/6/14 6:36 PM, "David Walker" <> wrote:

Oh, I thought the implementers call was this Wednesday (1/8) and pressed the AD Assurance group to finish.  If you're willing to go without references, the current draft ( https://spaces.internet2.edu/x/coW8Ag ) is ready to go.  I've moved it out of the restricted portion of our space and replaced the link to the old "May 2013" version. on the "AD Alternative Means - 2013" page.

David

On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 22:42 +0000, Ann West wrote:

That sounds great, Eric.


I will send out a call announcement regarding the implementers call for next Wednesday July 15 and include this agenda item. If we could get it out by the end of this week, that would give folks enough time I would think.


Thanks!
Ann






On 1/6/14 3:13 PM, "Eric Goodman" <> wrote:

Hi all,

 

Sorry I missed the call, the beauty of extra vacation days. :)

 

Looking at the notes, it would be a bit of work to find all of our references, but let me know if we want to do that and I’ll do my best to dig up the ones I’m responsible for! It’s a great idea, and we should have been documenting that way from the start, but of course hindsight and all that…

 

--- Eric

 

From: [] On Behalf Of David Walker
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 9:54 AM
To: InCommon AD Assurance Group
Subject: [AD-Assurance] Notes from the 1/3/2014 AD Assurance call


 

Everyone,

I've posted quick notes from today's call:

https://spaces.internet2.edu/x/sITFAg


I think this is ready to go for next week's Assurance Implementers call, although it's currently in a restricted section of the wiki.  Should we replace the current public draft with this one?

David