Meeting the InCommon Assurance profile criteria using Active Directory

[Eric Goodman <>]

I'more worried about others reviewing it. I'm happy with David's edits, but would love to hear that people have given it a technical once over. (I.e., configuration recommendations sections). But assuming silence = "looks good", I'm okay. 

Also, I offered but didn't see a response; should I be planning to present on the assurance call or is someone else doing that?

--- Eric

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 30, 2013, at 8:11 PM, "David Walker" <> wrote:

OK with me. Eric?

David

Ann West <> wrote:

Hi All,

Just checking if I should make the cookbook and child pages public and open the call for review?

Ann

From: David Walker <>
Reply-To: "" <>
Date: Sunday, September 29, 2013 8:40 PM
To: "" <>
Subject: Re: [AD-Assurance] Configuration recommendations

Eric,

It looked like you were probably finished with the current round of editing, so I made a few more, mostly to make some of the text flow a little better.  I also removed references to compensating controls.  Finally, I created a "monitor and mitigate" page to the wiki, by modifying our earlier alternative means proposal, and linked it into the Cookbook.

David

On Sat, 2013-09-28 at 06:07 +0000, Eric Goodman wrote:

I think with Jeff's notes, we have instructions to go with most configuration recommendations.

I said I would make a list of the gaps, but I think instead I would like to ask people just to look through the "configuration recommendations" section and double check any statements made about how to configure things to make sure they seem sensical, and if you note any specific instructions that appear to be missing.

Thanks!

--- Eric