Meeting the InCommon Assurance profile criteria using Active Directory

[Brian Arkills <>]

Just added my endorsement, sorry for the delay ... 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> 
>  [
> ]
>  On Behalf Of Eric Goodman
> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 11:06 AM
> To: 
> 
> Subject: [AD-Assurance] RE: REMINDER -- Endorsement signatures for
> alternate means proposal
> 
> As an update here, I've been asked to review the statement and
> endorsement language by my security and audit folks before signing on. I've
> contacted the relevant folks and expect to discuss with them in (hopefully!)
> the next few days. But however you slice it, that's going to add a delay to 
> my
> adding my name directly to the endorsement.
> 
> --- Eric
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> 
>  [
> ]
>  On Behalf Of Rank, Mark
> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 10:58 AM
> To: 
> 
> Subject: [AD-Assurance] REMINDER -- Endorsement signatures for alternate
> means proposal
> 
> Folks:
> 
> Just a friendly reminder that if you are planing on adding your name and
> institutional affiliation to the endorsement, please try and do so very 
> soon.
> The deadline that was mentioned has passed but we will not be discussing
> until the call tomorrow (Friday).
> 
> Regards,
> Mark
> 
> --------------------------------------------------
> Mark Rank
> Project Manager - Identity & Access Mgt
> UCSF Information Technology Services (ITS)
> email: 
> 
> phn:414-331-1476
> --------------------------------------------------
> 
> ________________________________________
> From: Rank, Mark
> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 8:29 AM
> To: 
> 
> Subject: Endorsement signatures for alternate means proposal
> 
> AD Assurance List,
> 
> At the weekly AD assurance call on Friday, one of the action items was 
> closing
> out the endorsement for the Alternate Means proposal originated by Ron
> Thielen of the University of Chicago.
> 
> The proposed alternate means is titled "Alternative Means for Satisfying
> Requirements 4.2.5.1, 4.2.5.2, and 4.2.8.2.1 in Active Directory Domain
> Services Environments" and is located ...
> 
> https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/InCAssurance/Alternative+Means+for
> +Satisfying+Requirements+4.2.5.1%2C+4.2.5.2%2C+and+4.2.8.2.1+in+Active
> +Directory+Domain+Services+Environments
> 
> At the bottom of the same page is the endorsement statement. The
> suggestion is members self-identify their affiliation with the AD Assurance
> Working Group and their endorsement. The more individuals and
> institutions, the stronger the endorsement. However, this method also
> allows the flexibility to opt out for those that may not have had time for 
> this
> particular item or for other reasons.
> 
> To allow the proposal and endorsement to be finalized at this weeks call, a
> target has been set of Thursday (6/6/2013) at Noon EDT for "signatures" to
> be added to the endorsement. If you wish to "sign", please go ahead and
> update the wiki article with your name and affiliation.
> 
> If there are questions, concerns or troubles access, please share to the 
> list or
> contact me directly.
> 
> Regards,
> Mark
> 
> --------------------------------------------------
> Mark Rank
> Project Manager - Identity & Access Mgt
> UCSF Information Technology Services (ITS)
> email: 
> 
> phn:414-331-1476
> --------------------------------------------------