ad-assurance - [AD-Assurance] RE: BitLocker operational issues
Subject: Meeting the InCommon Assurance profile criteria using Active Directory
List archive
- From: "Rank, Mark" <>
- To: "" <>
- Subject: [AD-Assurance] RE: BitLocker operational issues
- Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 20:24:04 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Authentication-results: sfpop-ironport04.merit.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
mark
--------------------------------------------------
Mark Rank
Project Manager - Identity & Access Mgt UCSF Information Technology Services (ITS)
email: phn:414-331-1476
--------------------------------------------------
From: [] on behalf of Ron Thielen []
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2013 1:20 PM To: Subject: [AD-Assurance] RE: BitLocker operational issues We didn’t rule out AM. We said that if BitLocker can be used, then you don’t need AM. If it can’t be used, then you need AM.
Ron
From: [mailto:]
On Behalf Of Rank, Mark
Why again did we rule out an alternate means for Microsoft's own proprietary encryption for the credential store?
Just curious. Mark
-------------------------------------------------- Mark Rank UCSF Information Technology Services (ITS) phn:414-331-1476 -------------------------------------------------- From:
[] on behalf of Ron Thielen [] I raised the question about BitLocker operational issues, because something was nagging at the back of my mind. I asked the Windows admins and they pointed me in the right direction.
It turns out that there is a significant issue that may affect some institutions. BitLocker is not supported in virtual environments by either Microsoft or VMware. We run some of our domain controllers on VMware VMs, so this is certainly an issue for us. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh831507.aspx#BKMK_VHD and
I guess we have to decide whether to move our VMs to physical hardware and lose the advantages that virtualization provides or submit an alternative means statement for RC4.
Ron
|
- [AD-Assurance] BitLocker operational issues, Ron Thielen, 06/07/2013
- [AD-Assurance] RE: BitLocker operational issues, Rank, Mark, 06/07/2013
- [AD-Assurance] RE: BitLocker operational issues, Ron Thielen, 06/07/2013
- [AD-Assurance] RE: BitLocker operational issues, Rank, Mark, 06/07/2013
- [AD-Assurance] RE: BitLocker operational issues, Michael W. Brogan, 06/07/2013
- [AD-Assurance] RE: BitLocker operational issues, Rank, Mark, 06/07/2013
- [AD-Assurance] RE: BitLocker operational issues, Eric Goodman, 06/07/2013
- [AD-Assurance] RE: BitLocker operational issues, Ron Thielen, 06/07/2013
- [AD-Assurance] RE: BitLocker operational issues, Michael W. Brogan, 06/07/2013
- [AD-Assurance] RE: BitLocker operational issues, Rank, Mark, 06/07/2013
- [AD-Assurance] RE: BitLocker operational issues, Ron Thielen, 06/07/2013
- [AD-Assurance] RE: BitLocker operational issues, Ron Thielen, 06/07/2013
- Re: [AD-Assurance] RE: BitLocker operational issues, David Walker, 06/10/2013
- [AD-Assurance] RE: BitLocker operational issues, Rank, Mark, 06/07/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.