Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

ad-assurance - Re: [AD-Assurance] Draft scope statement

Subject: Meeting the InCommon Assurance profile criteria using Active Directory

List archive

Re: [AD-Assurance] Draft scope statement

Chronological Thread 
  • From: David Walker <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [AD-Assurance] Draft scope statement
  • Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2013 15:50:52 -0800
  • Authentication-results:; dkim=pass (signature verified)

Looks good, Michael.

Regarding, I agree with the AD Cookbook's assessment that it's not relevant to IdP <=> Verifier communication.  The relevant section would be (S) Network Security, which says, "1. Appropriate measures shall be used to protect the confidentiality and integrity of network communications supporting IdMS operations.  Protected Channels should be used for communications between systems."


On Fri, 2013-03-08 at 22:31 +0000, Michael W. Brogan wrote:
I’ve posted a draft scope statement on the wiki:


The material Mark previously added to the page regarding mapping of AD products to the IdMS functional model is a different sort of thing from the scope of our effort,  but it’s valuable background. For now I just gave it a new subheading and kept the content on the Charter/Scope page, but it might work better as a separate reference page.



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page