technical-discuss - Re: [InC-Technical] Dual use versus separate keys for signing and encryption
Subject: InCommon Technical Discussions
List archive
- From: Scott Koranda <>
- To: "Cantor, Scott" <>
- Cc: Nick Roy <>, "" <>
- Subject: Re: [InC-Technical] Dual use versus separate keys for signing and encryption
- Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 15:25:45 -0500
> On 9/6/19, 4:19 PM, "Scott Koranda" <> wrote:
>
> > As new Shibboleth SPs are spun up with unique signing and encryption
> > keys it will be helpful if the admins can publish both without having to
> > make a special request.
>
> I wasn't trying to suggest it should take any special request, I was just
> speaking about defaults and "guiding" initial decisions.
>
> If somebody knows what they're doing, they should have complete control
> over those elements.
Thanks. I think we are in violent agreement.
Scott K
- [InC-Technical] Dual use versus separate keys for signing and encryption, Nick Roy, 09/06/2019
- RE: [InC-Technical] Dual use versus separate keys for signing and encryption, Wessel, Keith, 09/06/2019
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [InC-Technical] Dual use versus separate keys for signing and encryption, Cantor, Scott, 09/06/2019
- Re: [InC-Technical] Dual use versus separate keys for signing and encryption, Scott Koranda, 09/06/2019
- Re: [InC-Technical] Dual use versus separate keys for signing and encryption, Cantor, Scott, 09/06/2019
- Re: [InC-Technical] Dual use versus separate keys for signing and encryption, Scott Koranda, 09/06/2019
- Re: [InC-Technical] Dual use versus separate keys for signing and encryption, Cantor, Scott, 09/06/2019
- Re: [InC-Technical] Dual use versus separate keys for signing and encryption, Scott Koranda, 09/06/2019
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.