technical-discuss - Re: [InC-Technical] Dual use versus separate keys for signing and encryption
Subject: InCommon Technical Discussions
List archive
- From: "Cantor, Scott" <>
- To: Scott Koranda <>
- Cc: Nick Roy <>, "" <>
- Subject: Re: [InC-Technical] Dual use versus separate keys for signing and encryption
- Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 20:22:28 +0000
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=osu.edu; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=osu.edu; dkim=pass header.d=osu.edu; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=ApKjHN8A/8+EIg5RKYy6MBPLE7mRZTXyX+XyE7mqLxc=; b=ShDw/uy52Ia4FuaqPVIrNincIrudlg0Smjya6UnHsOuhnWzf87n2niyIaZdtcqhGqT++rYTHU07In8dcxZPA0s0fmgAf6yy/ZJfuUqz0N8R0vJ0xXB0Rz3oXR8uMjgQgGTslyNvi3W04f2yaMYxBEt6udlF5j6b+sglcK7XPUINb5OPUpw/sQ7UT8gO5kAgfgfByzKBw73uKr+XiaJQ0MO1Gi5on4amxaN/Vzv5VvKKUu2ijw+nFDBPePDoYfqzax7wJC+I7MCu+k63PaWSHDJBWtODCmuxMCdiqutnJSidNEyXLn/vdJn+doEatj94J/xa62r79kFIpEjq9SNytlw==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Nfg8CPcxi5YTy508tZuxAptgWs/WzOz+uWz9XpUoa3U7slpczr1KYTyAf7DxE0tdIaLZ46fUW2AQL8HjqJRtlzRFc/5Wb/8ZoQ4EddMG+pIivuE9n+/4+BYuosRztGu3wcnOA7UILwLRfm34aft/Oa0uFXmRLhLErvv7Bf1iSShsgZMW5ca5nmcjJW5JfQ2mecbL508/s0inK6OFqVTsdIPJM1Y8CJURjbV9dGHhRjjpsfkxxaP+5NaTvuP8zX4bwovt7VlxL45cR64eo2f635hKWapey/XccJvo8qcg3+gKPh2GLSE7k262XKJmdXyhyd7U/VNMWhL+Xrg3L0smUA==
On 9/6/19, 4:19 PM, "Scott Koranda" <> wrote:
> As new Shibboleth SPs are spun up with unique signing and encryption
> keys it will be helpful if the admins can publish both without having to
> make a special request.
I wasn't trying to suggest it should take any special request, I was just
speaking about defaults and "guiding" initial decisions.
If somebody knows what they're doing, they should have complete control over
those elements.
-- Scott
- [InC-Technical] Dual use versus separate keys for signing and encryption, Nick Roy, 09/06/2019
- RE: [InC-Technical] Dual use versus separate keys for signing and encryption, Wessel, Keith, 09/06/2019
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [InC-Technical] Dual use versus separate keys for signing and encryption, Cantor, Scott, 09/06/2019
- Re: [InC-Technical] Dual use versus separate keys for signing and encryption, Scott Koranda, 09/06/2019
- Re: [InC-Technical] Dual use versus separate keys for signing and encryption, Cantor, Scott, 09/06/2019
- Re: [InC-Technical] Dual use versus separate keys for signing and encryption, Scott Koranda, 09/06/2019
- Re: [InC-Technical] Dual use versus separate keys for signing and encryption, Cantor, Scott, 09/06/2019
- Re: [InC-Technical] Dual use versus separate keys for signing and encryption, Scott Koranda, 09/06/2019
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.