Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

per-entity - Re: [Per-Entity] deploying TLS on the MDQ server

Subject: Per-Entity Metadata Working Group

List archive

Re: [Per-Entity] deploying TLS on the MDQ server


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Scavo <>
  • To: "Cantor, Scott" <>
  • Cc: Tom Scavo <>, Per-Entity Metadata Working Group <>
  • Subject: Re: [Per-Entity] deploying TLS on the MDQ server
  • Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2016 09:31:27 -0400
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23:w5gJDRYQHWhq7sr2dJpk3eb/LSx+4OfEezUN459isYplN5qZpsW8bnLW6fgltlLVR4KTs6sC0LWG9f27EjVdqb+681k8M7V0HycfjssXmwFySOWkMmbcaMDQUiohAc5ZX0Vk9XzoeWJcGcL5ekGA6ibqtW1aMlzFOAF0PuX4HJLJx4Tyjrjqus6bXwIdzhG0Z691NlH+lg7WqtVcyd9pI6AtzQGP+FNPYPkQyG91cwG9hRH5s/u3+dZY+C1OvLp169RbWqzkeIw5S6BVFjIrLzpz6cH240qQBTCT72cRBz1F2iFDBBLIuVSjBs/8

On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Cantor, Scott
<>
wrote:
>
> To be honest, I really didn't consider it likely we'd get the validUntil
> window tight enough to really give me the warm fuzzies. I would be very
> happy to see it happen, obviously, but I understand the difficulties.

Can you be more specific about what you think is "tight enough?"

> I do think that the issues with aggregates and MDQ are very different. The
> longer window on the aggregate works mainly because the updates are much
> less frequent and less predictable in terms of timing.

I'm not following you. On the production side, aggregates and entities
are identical since they emanate from the same infrastructure. On the
client side, request patterns are different, I realize that, but I
don't see how that influences validUntil. I think I'm missing
something.

Tom



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page