Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

per-entity - RE: [Per-Entity] splitting the aggregate

Subject: Per-Entity Metadata Working Group

List archive

RE: [Per-Entity] splitting the aggregate


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Cantor, Scott" <>
  • To: Tom Scavo <>, Per-Entity Metadata Working Group <>
  • Subject: RE: [Per-Entity] splitting the aggregate
  • Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 13:53:58 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 164.107.81.218) smtp.mailfrom=osu.edu; incommon.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;incommon.org; dmarc=bestguesspass action=none header.from=osu.edu;
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
> As an interim measure (while per-entity metadata distribution is
> spinning up), some folks have suggested that Ops split the main
> InCommon aggregate into smaller SP and IdP aggregates and distribute
> each separately. Is such a strategy advisable?

I think it's a good idea, but would probably want to run some benchmarks on
the improvement to really say for sure. If we don't see a likely workaround
for discovery in the medium term, I think it may be more than advisable.

-- Scott


Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page