Per-Entity Metadata Working Group

[Chris Phillips <>]

Yes.  We are in general alignment.  I won't go as many '>' as you however.
I'm reluctant to sacrifice instrumentation at all costs for
reliability/performance, but will definitely favour
reliability/performance.  For the report, I think it's about what's
possible and at what estimated cost for an implementation.


Do you go to a 'restaurant' for a good meal, a fast meal, or an economical
meal?  

Does one implement MDQ for reliability/performance, with visibility, or
cost effectiveness?


Either question is a pick 2 from the 3 options unless you aim for 'what's
sufficient from each?'

C

On 2016-08-04, 10:36 AM, "Cantor, Scott" 
<>
 wrote:

>This is why I'm not so sure of the cost involved in achieving adequate
>reliability, and adding the requirement to have total visibility on top
>of that may create a basic conflict. I think reliability/performance >>>
>visibility.