Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

metadata-support - RE: [Metadata-Support] support for WantAssertionsSigned in FM

Subject: InCommon metadata support

List archive

RE: [Metadata-Support] support for WantAssertionsSigned in FM


Chronological Thread 
  • From: "Cantor, Scott" <>
  • To: "" <>
  • Subject: RE: [Metadata-Support] support for WantAssertionsSigned in FM
  • Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2018 14:56:14 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: spf=pass (sender IP is 128.146.163.18) smtp.mailfrom=osu.edu; incommon.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;incommon.org; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=osu.edu;
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
> It was strongly recommended that we not support this metadata element.

I would characterize my advice as "conflicted". The flag serves its purpose
fine, but it's not meant to support buggy SPs that are requiring something
for no reason.

So that seems likes a slippery slope to me, and I preferred to be very
forceful with Qualtrics about it being a bug, and I did so. Unfortunately
that's the extent of my leverage.

I would e.g. be in favor of the flag being supported if there were a gating
function that evaluated whether the SP had a real reason (and since that
would never happen...)

-- Scott


Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page