Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

metadata-support - Re: [Metadata-Support] RE: MDQ status?

Subject: InCommon metadata support

List archive

Re: [Metadata-Support] RE: MDQ status?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Tom Poage <>
  • To: "" <>
  • Subject: Re: [Metadata-Support] RE: MDQ status?
  • Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 18:32:48 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) ;
  • Ironport-phdr: 9a23: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
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99

Good question: I didn't think to ask that. Thanks for the tip.

My question on MDQ still stands, tho'.

Tom.

´╗┐On 3/8/18, 10:30 AM,
"
on behalf of Cantor, Scott"
<
on behalf of
>
wrote:

> I have some SP operators noticing/complaining about the ever increasing
> amount of time to start the SP. I think they're using all the usual
tricks of e.g.
> using the IdP-only aggregate, increasing timeouts and the like.

And are they skipping the verify at startup against the backup file? But
if 90 secs or so is too much, ok, not much to be done. I find I can live with
it on mine given how rarely I have to start it.

-- Scott






  • Re: [Metadata-Support] RE: MDQ status?, Tom Poage, 03/08/2018

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page