Subject: InCommon metadata support
- From: Christopher Bongaarts <>
- Subject: Re: [Metadata-Support] Announcement audience?
- Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:06:25 -0600
- Organization: University of Minnesota
On 1/23/2014 10:36 AM, Tom Poage wrote:
On Jan 21, 2014, at 2:26 PM, Tom Scavo
>At this point, only the site administrators have been contacted butI think part of the answer depends on the typical number of IdPs federating
>your point is well taken. Perhaps we should reach out to all technical
>contacts in metadata as well? Would this help?
>What do others think about contacting all technical contacts in metadata?
with most SPs.
If the typical SP is someone's homegrown app and only used by one or two
IdPs, perhaps it makes sense for IdP operators to contact them directly.
Larger SPs--those federating with numerous IdPs--would incur some overhead of
being contacted numerous times by each IdP operator, not to mention aggregate
effort of N IdPs contacting M SP operators (NxM).
My opinion (which should not be weighted too highly as my institution does not have any SPs registered yet) is that SPs that are interested in keeping up with this sort of thing should subscribe to the InCommon ops list. If an institution registers an SP themselves, they can take responsibility for passing along the notifications if the SP operator chooses not to subscribe. An institution could choose, as part of registering an SP with InCommon, to recommend that the SP operator subscribe to the ops list.
No need for broadcasting to all contact addresses - those should be used for more targeted communications (e.g. "Your specific SP has a particular problem, please fix").
%% Christopher A. Bongaarts %%
%% OIT - Identity Management %% http://umn.edu/~cab %%
%% University of Minnesota %% +1 (612) 625-1809 %%
- [Metadata-Support] Announcement audience?, Tom Poage, 01/21/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.