interfed - Re: [inc-interfed] comments re "New InCommon IdPs"
Subject: Interfederation
List archive
- From: "Cantor, Scott" <>
- To: "" <>
- Subject: Re: [inc-interfed] comments re "New InCommon IdPs"
- Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 14:57:22 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
On 3/4/14, 9:53 AM, "Scott Koranda"
<>
wrote:
>
>IdPs that want to support it should have to take some action to expose
>the functionality.
>
>If there could be some type of "InCommon blessed" Shibboleth IdP
>deployment
>or configuration (as asked by Steven) having it not include artifact
>or attribute query by default would also be helpful I think.
That's basically what Tom is saying, so it sounds like you're both on the
same page. If so, I'm fine, I just didn't want to see us push that way
without your input.
-- Scott
- [inc-interfed] comments re "New InCommon IdPs", Tom Scavo, 03/04/2014
- Re: [inc-interfed] comments re "New InCommon IdPs", Scott Koranda, 03/04/2014
- Re: [inc-interfed] comments re "New InCommon IdPs", Tom Scavo, 03/04/2014
- Re: [inc-interfed] comments re "New InCommon IdPs", Scott Koranda, 03/04/2014
- Re: [inc-interfed] comments re "New InCommon IdPs", Cantor, Scott, 03/04/2014
- Re: [inc-interfed] comments re "New InCommon IdPs", Tom Scavo, 03/04/2014
- Re: [inc-interfed] comments re "New InCommon IdPs", Cantor, Scott, 03/04/2014
- Re: [inc-interfed] comments re "New InCommon IdPs", Cantor, Scott, 03/04/2014
- Re: [inc-interfed] comments re "New InCommon IdPs", Tom Scavo, 03/04/2014
- Re: [inc-interfed] comments re "New InCommon IdPs", Cantor, Scott, 03/04/2014
- Re: [inc-interfed] comments re "New InCommon IdPs", Cantor, Scott, 03/04/2014
- Re: [inc-interfed] comments re "New InCommon IdPs", Scott Koranda, 03/04/2014
- Re: [inc-interfed] comments re "New InCommon IdPs", Tom Scavo, 03/04/2014
- Re: [inc-interfed] comments re "New InCommon IdPs", Scott Koranda, 03/04/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.