interfed - Re: [inc-interfed] Interfed WG Observations
Subject: Interfederation
List archive
- From: "Cantor, Scott" <>
- To: "" <>
- Subject: Re: [inc-interfed] Interfed WG Observations
- Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:17:05 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
On 2/20/14, 5:52 PM, "Tom Scavo"
<>
wrote:
>
>This pretty much requires contacts in metadata IMO. InCommon will
>export metadata with contact information and I expect we will only
>import metadata with contact information, otherwise there's no way for
>the partners to communicate. I realize this is going to cause problems
>for some Federations but I don't see any alternative.
I think you're jumping into the ad hoc case, but this is very untrue in
the more numerous cases we have of outsourcing.
It does suggest perhaps that a filter criteria of "has contacts of type X"
might be of value to deployers though.
-- Scott
- [inc-interfed] Interfed WG Observations, John Krienke, 02/19/2014
- Re: [inc-interfed] Interfed WG Observations, Tom Scavo, 02/20/2014
- Re: [inc-interfed] Interfed WG Observations, Cantor, Scott, 02/21/2014
- Re: [inc-interfed] Interfed WG Observations, Tom Scavo, 02/20/2014
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.