Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

inc-librsvcs - [inc-librsvcs] seeking feedback, Resource Registry....

Subject: InCommon Library Services

List archive

[inc-librsvcs] seeking feedback, Resource Registry....


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Steven Carmody <>
  • To:
  • Subject: [inc-librsvcs] seeking feedback, Resource Registry....
  • Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 14:17:30 -0400

Hi,

This list, and this group, has been quiet for a while. But, there has been activity behind the scenes!

Thomas Howell from Northwestern has developed a Registry application which we can use to share information about SAML-enabled resources, and to share implementation details among universities who would like to integrate with specific SAML-enabled vendor resources. This Registry is planned to be a community-driven resource -- a place were all of us can share what we know and learn from what others know. The goal is to provide information on some of the details and quirks of particular SAML implementations, as well as describing any additional useful features provided by the SP. We hope it will become a one-stop-shopping site for information on features, functionality, configuration, quirks, contact information, and anything else that the community would find useful.

The current implementation is a prototype. I think we all owe Thomas a big "thank you" for starting this effort. We all expect, though, that the functionality in the Registry will continue to evolve, as our understanding of the problem grows, and as our needs for additional information continue to evolve. But, it seems "functional enough" today to begin the process of rolling it out to the community.

The Registry is a database-driven application; data entry won't be free form (as on a wiki) but rather data will be entered into pre-defined fields. This email is an effort to list the fields available in the current implementation, and seek comments, feedback, and suggestions on any additional fields that people feel are important to include in the short term. We expect the Registry to continue to evolve, so this isn't the last opportunity to ask for additional functionality. So, the question is "what would be important to add right now".

Once we hear feedback and act on it, we'll be announcing the Registry and how to use it.

The current list of fields includes:

1. Vendor: vendor's name
2. Resource: the particular resource in question, since many vendors have multiple platforms
3. Status: vendor/resource's status of Shibboleth implementation. This may even be that the vendor does not intend to implement Shibboleth
4. Shibboleth-enabled: whether or not the resource is Shibboleth-enabled, also what version of Shibboleth service provider
5. InCommon Member: whether or not the vendor is an InCommon member
6. WAYFless support: whether or not the vendor has implemented WAYFless URLs
7. Direct Linking support: whether or not the vendor has implemented Shibboleth-authenticated direct links to resources
8. URL syntax: example syntax of shibboleth-authenticated WAYFless URLs
9. Shibboleth Attributes: if there is a standard set of attributes resource expects, it will be identified here
10. Features: a place to list features such as personalization features
11. Contact: contact information
12. Document: links to configuration information or how tos
13. EZP Example: EZP config examples used by institutes
14. Common-lib-terms Support

Please send any comments, thoughts, and suggestions to this email list.

And thanks for your help!


  • [inc-librsvcs] seeking feedback, Resource Registry...., Steven Carmody, 05/19/2011

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page