Subject: InCommon Library Services
List archive
- From: Dean Woodbeck <>
- To:
- Subject: DRAFT Minutes - Library Services Working Group - 03-Oct-2008
- Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 16:54:29 -0400
InCommon Library
Services Working Group
Draft Minutes
October 3, 2008
**Attending**
Holly Eggleston, University of California-San Diego (chair)
Steven Carmody, Brown University
Tom Barton, University of Chicago
Ann West, Internet2/EDUCAUSE
Dean Woodbeck, Internet2 (scribe)
********
There was a general discussion about the future of the
Library Services group and possible next steps.
Generally, the group has:
- discussed technologies that would
be useful for federating library services, particularly the special use
cases of walk-in patrons and remote access. There have been no
recommendations or best practices developed.
- done some component testing, but
not really functional testing. The University of Maryland did a pilot
with EBSCO.
Suggestions for next steps:
- develop a summary of the group’s
discussions/accomplishments, the value delivered by the federating
approaches that have been discussed.
- look at options for associating
this working group with a library-related organization
- open the working group to a wider
audience
- reconstitute the working group
with schools that have the resources and interest in conducting pilots.
We need an early adopter group and some successful deploys to gain
traction.
- determine how to start and foster
this conversation among librarians.
- a number of schools have several
federated applications operating with Shibboleth – invite them to the
call. This would provide them with additional applications to consider.
There are a number of schools and organizations that might
be right for piloting:
- the University of Chicago is
moving forward. Applications in production (using Shibboleth and
EZProxy) include RefWorks and Elsevier (Scopus and Science Direct).
- CIC, OhioLink, NJEdge
- NCMC (North Carolina) has a pilot
starting – not library databases, but repositories with similar issues.
Perhaps they could include a library resource?
Open questions
- How to disseminate information and
to whom (white papers? wiki? others?)
- Identifying the right institutions
and people for the next steps (both librarians and library IT people?)
Tom will talk with the librarian at Chicago for advice on engaging the
library community.
- Building the case for direct
federated access to Shib-enabled resources, instead of SSO-enabled
EZProxy and continued IP-based access for all resources.
|
- DRAFT Minutes - Library Services Working Group - 03-Oct-2008, Dean Woodbeck, 10/08/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.