inc-librsvcs - Re: [inc-librsvcs] sample use of mod_auth_location
Subject: InCommon Library Services
List archive
- From:
- To: "David Kennedy" <>, <>
- Subject: Re: [inc-librsvcs] sample use of mod_auth_location
- Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2007 12:37:39 -0400
At 10:45 AM -0400 11/2/07, David Kennedy wrote:
Steven,
Thank you for setting this up. I am still uncomfortable with our group focusing so much on mod_auth_location as a solution. I understand that one of our goals is to "sell" shibboleth to libraries. And I understand that mod_auth_location helps with the IP address management problem, but it does so by degrading the user experience to less than what we have today. I don't think that library administrators are going to get excited about this tradeoff.
On the other hand, our group has done some valuable work with ezproxy. I think we should be promoting the hell out of this tool.
To be honest, I can't make a strong argument for selling shibboleth to libraries, except that it is the most elegant single sign on solution. That was a strong enough argument for us to implement shibboleth. But, I do not see shibboleth as a complete access management solution for online resources. Ezproxy already does a better job than shibboleth can do on its own.
let's talk about this on the call....
I think they solve different problems... they can be used independently, they can be used together, in a variety of ways....
- Re: [inc-librsvcs] sample use of mod_auth_location, David Kennedy, 11/02/2007
- Re: [inc-librsvcs] sample use of mod_auth_location, Steven_Carmody, 11/02/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.