inc-lib-vendor - WAYFless IdP name formats - URL vs. URN
Subject: InC-Lib-Vendor
List archive
- From: "Kent Percival" <>
- To: <>
- Subject: WAYFless IdP name formats - URL vs. URN
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 11:29:33 -0400 (EDT)
Andy has captured current practise
in the Best Practises document, including two forms of a URL providing direct
access to a resource without a WAYF re-direct. I just wanted to
check one thing that I had a query on by another library supplier. One of those forms, used by some
vendors, includes entity names in URN format (urn:mace: …) referring to
Identity Provider entities. At one time MACE pushed the use of the
more general URN format. However more recently the case is being made for
the use of traditional URL formats. See https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/SHIB2/EntityNaming http://www.ukfederation.org.uk/content/Documents/EntityIDPolicy In the Best Practise examples, I
think the urn format exists only because the example IdP was registered with
the URN name - it could easily be replaced by a URL format name as registered
by another organization. That means that the SP service
would have to handle both name formats. right???
....Kent _ |
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
- SerialsSolutions and Shibboleth - anyone have this set up?, Andy Ingham, 09/04/2009
- Re: [InC-Lib-Vendor] SerialsSolutions and Shibboleth - anyone have this set up?, David Kennedy, 09/08/2009
- WAYFless IdP name formats - URL vs. URN, Kent Percival, 09/10/2009
- Re: [InC-Lib-Vendor] WAYFless IdP name formats - URL vs. URN, Andy Ingham, 09/10/2009
- Re: [InC-Lib-Vendor] SerialsSolutions and Shibboleth - anyone have this set up?, Andy Ingham, 09/10/2009
- WAYFless IdP name formats - URL vs. URN, Kent Percival, 09/10/2009
- Re: [InC-Lib-Vendor] SerialsSolutions and Shibboleth - anyone have this set up?, David Kennedy, 09/08/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.