inc-lib-vendor - RE: [InC-Lib-Vendor] eduPersonEntitlement and our campus IT group (ITS)
Subject: InC-Lib-Vendor
List archive
- From: David Kennedy <>
- To: Foster Zhang <>
- Cc: inc-lib-vendor <>, Andy Ingham <>
- Subject: RE: [InC-Lib-Vendor] eduPersonEntitlement and our campus IT group (ITS)
- Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:06:06 -0400
Foster,
Are these three values of eduPersonEntitlement released to all InCommon service providers, or are they released individually to the appropriate service provider?
BTW, I started a thread on the shib-users list this morning about this attribute and how it is not currently standardized, which I think has resulted in the three different values that you are currently releasing.
Dave
-----
David Kennedy
Systems Programmer
Perkins Library, Duke University
(919) 613-6831
Foster Zhang <> wrote on 07/23/2009 02:45:36 PM:
> Andy.
>
> We have 3 value of eduPersonEntitlement" released to outside.
>
> urn:mace:dir:attribute-def:eduPersonEntitlement urn:mace:oclc.org:
> 10032420
> urn:mace:dir:attribute-def:eduPersonEntitlement urn:mace:incommon:
> entitlement:common:1
> urn:mace:dir:attribute-def:eduPersonEntitlement urn:mace:dir:
> entitlement:common-lib-terms
>
> the first will be used by OCLC, and carry a value of OCLC account info.
> The 2nd is used by Ebscohost and others when the common-lib-terms
> has not been released as the standard value.
> The 3rd one should be used by broad applications.
>
> eduPersonEntitlement value is set at the campus IT, to my
> experiences, any changes will require IT engineer's work.
>
> Foster
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Ingham [mailto:]
> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 11:35 AM
> To: inc-lib-vendor
> Subject: [InC-Lib-Vendor] eduPersonEntitlement and our campus IT group (ITS)
>
> Vendor subcommittee --
>
> [I'll forewarn you that I'm sending this message the day before I'll be
> away from the office for almost two weeks, but wanted to get my ideas
> down and out before I forgot them all :) ]
>
> Now that our EZProxy is Shibbolized (at least for the 85% of folks who
> authenticate with the standard campus ID), the next step is to
> Shibbolize individual resources.
>
> It is obvious that "eduPersonEntitlement" will be VERY important to the
> success of this.
>
> Since central IT on campus (ITS) controls the IdP which backends all
> this, I need to discuss with them the defining and populating of that
> attribute (among others potentially, but this is the single most
> important one).
>
> So, I've been thinking a lot about the process: how to approach the
> issue with them (and with Library staff), what timeline to expect, what
> *I* can do to grease the wheels (sell the importance), etc.
>
> Since others on this group have covered this ground already, I thought
> I'd ask a few questions.
>
> (1) How does "eduPersonEntitlement" get populated on YOUR campus? Is it
> an on-the-fly assignment based on other criteria / conditions? E.g.,
> person A is tagged in the LDAP in a certain way as of the time of the
> auth request and so "eduPersonEntitlement" gets sent back with a value
> of "common-lib-terms" (which is what I understand to be the most
> generally useful value for this attribute)
>
> (2) For the first 10 years of our proxy service, we've always checked
> our ILS's patron database to verify "patron type" and "expiration date"
> to authorize use of the proxy. We've had initial discussions with ITS
> about having THEM setup our patron db as an "attribute provider" such
> that the IdP can check these things as part of the process of
> authenticating users and releasing attributes back to the SP. Does it
> make sense to "continue to" base the assignment of "common-lib-terms" to
> the "eduPersonEntitlement" attribute on THESE criteria or is now the
> time to break away from that reliance and base the assignment on
> criteria that is **in the campus LDAP**?
>
> (3) How are you handling "walk in" users in this new architecture? Or
> is this being deferred until a time when we are far enough along that we
> can start "dismantling" the IP-based setups? (Until the vendor DOESN'T
> maintain a list of IP ranges for our campus, walk-in access will
> continue to just work as it does now, whether a patron goes directly to
> a resource or mediates through a library page that is a gatekeeper for
> EZproxy use.)
>
> Thanks in advance for any and all thoughts on these questions.
>
> Andy
>
> Andy Ingham
> Assistant Head, Library Systems
> University Library
> UNC-Chapel Hill
> 919-962-1288
>
- eduPersonEntitlement and our campus IT group (ITS), Andy Ingham, 07/23/2009
- Re: [InC-Lib-Vendor] eduPersonEntitlement and our campus IT group (ITS), David Kennedy, 07/23/2009
- RE: [InC-Lib-Vendor] eduPersonEntitlement and our campus IT group (ITS), Foster Zhang, 07/23/2009
- RE: [InC-Lib-Vendor] eduPersonEntitlement and our campus IT group (ITS), David Kennedy, 07/23/2009
- RE: [InC-Lib-Vendor] eduPersonEntitlement and our campus IT group (ITS), Foster Zhang, 07/23/2009
- RE: [InC-Lib-Vendor] eduPersonEntitlement and our campus IT group (ITS), David Kennedy, 07/23/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.