inc-lib-vendor - RE: [InC-Lib-Vendor] conference call this friday, 1pm
Subject: InC-Lib-Vendor
List archive
- From: "Kent Percival" <>
- To: "inc-lib-vendor" <>
- Subject: RE: [InC-Lib-Vendor] conference call this friday, 1pm
- Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 16:22:05 -0400 (EDT)
Mostly I agree – no need to
duplicate. However, I think we planned on targeting a priority list of
vendors/services and were seeking input on those priorities. We
likely don’t want our priorities mixed up with the full vendor registry.
The Registry could become pretty long, given that Elsevier, for example, has 20
some products! I added a column in the Target
Resources to contemplate whether we want to fill in the Priority column.
We may want to sort-on-priority to determine which calls to make first. BTW, the Registry is complicated by
the fact that vendors have many products in various states of readiness.
The InCommon membership is associated with the Vendor (as I understand), not
the individual products. I didn’t get around to suggesting a different
format for the table – something like an asterisk beside the vendors
names of those who are InCommon members. ....Kent _ From:
[mailto:] On Behalf Of Adam Chandler Dave, Maybe this is splitting hairs,
but we should merge TargetResources into RegistryOfResources. I don't
think we need two separate lists. Simply populate RegistryOfResources with
the items in TargetResources. By virtue of the fact that they are listed
in the RegistryOfResources makes them Target resources. Simpler to
maintain one list than two. I won't be able to make the call
Friday (vacation). - Adam On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 3:31 PM,
David Kennedy <>
wrote:
|
- conference call this friday, 1pm, David Kennedy, 05/19/2009
- Re: [InC-Lib-Vendor] conference call this friday, 1pm, Adam Chandler, 05/19/2009
- RE: [InC-Lib-Vendor] conference call this friday, 1pm, Kent Percival, 05/19/2009
- Re: [InC-Lib-Vendor] conference call this friday, 1pm, Adam Chandler, 05/19/2009
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.