Defining Use Cases for Federating Library Services

["Paul B. Hill" <>]

Hi,

I noticed that 
https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/inclibrary/Shibbolized+EZproxy 
says, "Is the site Shib-enabled? If yes, always redirect directly to the 
site, bypassing the next two phases. "

MIT's current position is that direct Shib-access is a fall back for 
off-campus users that are making direct access to the vendor's site and 
not going through the campus EZproxy. This is because we are 
implementing finer grained access control within EZProxy than our IdP 
currently supports.

I think we would be more comfortable with the following wording:

Is the site Shib-enabled? If yes, then the user may be redirected 
directly to the site, bypassing the next two phases.

Paul

T. Howell wrote:
> Hello Everyone,
>
> This is just a Friday reminder that we will be meeting at 12:00PM EDT,
> 11:00AM CDT today.
> Phone bridge: +1-866-411-0013 (toll free in the US and Canada) or
> +1-734-615-7474
> PIN: 0136010#
>
> Two agenda points to cover today:
> - Try and finalize the template.
> - Review the EZProxy Shibboleth case. 
>
> If you haven't checked out the wiki lately, please take at least a cursory
> glance at the section on the template, as well as the EZProxy/Shibboleth
> entry.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
> Thomas Howell.
> Lead Web Developer and Systems Analyst
> Northwestern University Library Technology Division