certsvc-review - RE: [CertSvc Review] feedback on survey
Subject: Cert Service Webinar Evaluation
List archive
- From: Paul Caskey <>
- To: "Basney, Jim" <>
- Cc: Ann West <>, "" <>
- Subject: RE: [CertSvc Review] feedback on survey
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 21:32:08 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) ;
- Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
- Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
Hi Jim- Very good points on 1 and 2, but I need a little help understanding #3. Are you saying that end users could authenticate via fed/sso and retrieve a cert? In the current setup, the RAO would need to enter/upload
their user details first and send them an invitation. We’d need to discuss with Comodo how that might work, but I like the idea. Let me know if I am misunderstanding it… Otherwise, we’ll chat with Comodo about the idea on our next call (FWIW, I was able
to login to CCM Dev via shib last week, so we’re getting close.). Thanks much! From: Basney, Jim [mailto:]
Hi, I think the "Additional Questions - Not a Current Subscriber" option should include an optional question asking, "Do you have any questions or comments on the
InCommon Certificate Service offering that could influence your decision to subscribe in the future?" In other words, it'd be good to find out why they are not subscribers and if there's something InCommon could do to change their mind. For "What is the most challenging part of certificate lifecycle management?" I suggest adding "in your experience with the InCommon Cert Service?" In other words,
we're not asking for a theoretical opinion about certificate lifecycle management but rather for their experience of the InCommon Cert Service. Under potential enhancements we have "Federation/SSO for the Certificate Manager system" but not "Federation/SSO
for user self-enrollment". I think the former is about RAOs and DRAOs logging in to the Cert Manager for approving requests but the latter is about user's logging in to get their certificates directly (i.e., like with CILogon) to eliminate manual RAO/DRAO
approval. I think TCS supports that now. Otherwise looks great! -Jim On 11/13/15, 4:30 PM,
on behalf of Paul Caskey wrote:
|
- [CertSvc Review] feedback on survey, Paul Caskey, 11/13/2015
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [CertSvc Review] feedback on survey, Basney, Jim, 11/17/2015
- RE: [CertSvc Review] feedback on survey, Paul Caskey, 11/17/2015
- Re: [CertSvc Review] feedback on survey, Basney, Jim, 11/17/2015
- RE: [CertSvc Review] feedback on survey, Paul Caskey, 11/18/2015
- RE: [CertSvc Review] feedback on survey, Paul Caskey, 11/18/2015
- Re: [CertSvc Review] feedback on survey, E Todd Atkins, 11/18/2015
- RE: [CertSvc Review] feedback on survey, Paul Caskey, 11/18/2015
- Re: [CertSvc Review] feedback on survey, E Todd Atkins, 11/18/2015
- RE: [CertSvc Review] feedback on survey, Paul Caskey, 11/18/2015
- Re: [CertSvc Review] feedback on survey, E Todd Atkins, 11/18/2015
- RE: [CertSvc Review] feedback on survey, Paul Caskey, 11/18/2015
- Re: [CertSvc Review] feedback on survey, Basney, Jim, 11/18/2015
- RE: [CertSvc Review] feedback on survey, Paul Caskey, 11/18/2015
- RE: [CertSvc Review] feedback on survey, Paul Caskey, 11/18/2015
- Re: [CertSvc Review] feedback on survey, Basney, Jim, 11/17/2015
- RE: [CertSvc Review] feedback on survey, Paul Caskey, 11/17/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.