assurance - Re: [Assurance] Executive Order from the President of the United States

Subject: Assurance

List archive

Re: [Assurance] Executive Order from the President of the United States

From: "Bradner, Scott" <>
To: "" <>
Cc: "" <>
Subject: Re: [Assurance] Executive Order from the President of the United States
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 20:27:49 +0000
Accept-language: en-US

I have wondered, why did I2 decide to not just use the NIST standards -

seems to present an ongoing issue to be " comparable, but not the same’

Scott

On Oct 21, 2014, at 4:24 PM, Michael R. Gettes <> wrote:

NIST 1 != Bronze.
NIST 2 != Silver.

They are comparable, but not the same.

/mrg

On Oct 21, 2014, at 4:19 PM, Brett Bieber <> wrote:

That document doesn't mention specifications such as NIST Levels 1 (Bronze), 2 (Silver), 3, 4, directly, but instead generalizes the importance of common standards, requirements, & accountability.

[Assurance] Executive Order from the President of the United States, Brett Bieber, 10/21/2014
- Re: [Assurance] Executive Order from the President of the United States, Michael R. Gettes, 10/21/2014
  - Re: [Assurance] Executive Order from the President of the United States, Bradner, Scott, 10/21/2014
    - RE: [Assurance] Executive Order from the President of the United States, Farmer, Jacob, 10/21/2014
      - RE: [Assurance] Executive Order from the President of the United States, Jones, Mark B, 10/21/2014
        
        RE: [Assurance] Executive Order from the President of the United States, Farmer, Jacob, 10/21/2014
        
        Re: [Assurance] Executive Order from the President of the United States, Ann West, 10/21/2014

List archive

Re: [Assurance] Executive Order from the President of the United States