assurance - Re: [Assurance] SHA-2 Update
Subject: Assurance
List archive
- From: Ann West <>
- To: "" <>
- Subject: Re: [Assurance] SHA-2 Update
- Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 20:42:58 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
Hence your concern of the matter. ;)
Thanks for asking about this, Dave.
From: David Langenberg <>
Reply-To: "" <> Date: Thursday, September 5, 2013 4:39 PM To: "" <> Subject: Re: [Assurance] SHA-2 Update Heh, I could've told you we'd fail that test miserably. IIRC only the most recent release of RHEL had the proper openssl libs in place to handle SHA-2. In our implementation just about every unix machine that needed to have "Protected Channels"
got it's own custom build of OpenSSL installed.
Dave On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Ann West
<> wrote:
David Langenberg Identity & Access Management
The University of Chicago
|
- [Assurance] SHA-2 Update, Ann West, 09/05/2013
- Re: [Assurance] SHA-2 Update, David Langenberg, 09/05/2013
- Re: [Assurance] SHA-2 Update, Ann West, 09/05/2013
- Re: [Assurance] SHA-2 Update, David Langenberg, 09/05/2013
- RE: [Assurance] SHA-2 Update, Capehart,Jeffrey D, 09/05/2013
- Re: [Assurance] SHA-2 Update, Cantor, Scott, 09/05/2013
- Re: [Assurance] SHA-2 Update, David Langenberg, 09/05/2013
- Re: [Assurance] SHA-2 Update, Cantor, Scott, 09/05/2013
- Re: [Assurance] SHA-2 Update, Ann West, 09/05/2013
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [Assurance] SHA-2 Update, Joe St Sauver, 09/05/2013
- Re: [Assurance] SHA-2 Update, David Langenberg, 09/05/2013
- Re: [Assurance] SHA-2 Update, Joe St Sauver, 09/05/2013
- Re: [Assurance] SHA-2 Update, David Langenberg, 09/05/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.