Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

assurance - Re: [Assurance] If apply for Silver, then apply for Bronze?

Subject: Assurance

List archive

Re: [Assurance] If apply for Silver, then apply for Bronze?


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Ann West <>
  • To:
  • Subject: Re: [Assurance] If apply for Silver, then apply for Bronze?
  • Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 14:12:06 -0400 (EDT)



----- Original Message -----
> On 6/20/12 12:52 PM, "Ann West"
> <>
> wrote:
> >
> >But can't I just assert Bronze-ness for Silver users? Because of the
> >differences in implementation, InCommon has no way of knowing. The
> >IdPO
> >needs to have processes in place to determine whether users that
> >aren't
> >Silver qualify for Bronze. In some cases, IdPOs are setting up
> >separate
> >systems for Silver. The second-factor credential may qualify for
> >Silver,
> >but the plain-old-password infrastructure used to support Bronze may
> >not.
> >
> >So InCommon and the AAC propose requiring IdPOs applying for Silver
> >certification to also apply for Bronze. There is no impact to the
> >fees to
> >support both, and no audit needed if one uses the new Representation
> >of
> >Conformance methodology in the new 1.2 version of the Identity
> >Assurance
> >Profiles.
>
> To clarify, the assumption is that if my passwords weren't sufficient
> for
> Bronze, but I had a Silver credential, I would map requests for
> Bronze to
> the use of that credential?

That is one of several options, yes.

Ann



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page