Meeting the InCommon Assurance profile criteria using Active Directory

[Ann West <>]

Hi folks, 

I'll be missing this call.

Ann

On 2/21/14 12:00 PM, "Eric Goodman" <> wrote:

Thanks Ron. I know we may discuss in two minutes but a couple of quick (minor) comments:

 

1)      In the second bullet is it really “Monitor and Mitigate and establishing a Protected Channel”, or should the “and” be “or”?

2)      I thought we all agreed that “Monitor and Mitigate” was not an alternate means, but a means. I do note we still list the Alternate Means in the AM section of the document. Should that be removed?

 

--- Eric

 

From: [] On Behalf Of Ron Thielen
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 3:18 PM
To:
Subject: RE: [AD-Assurance] RE: Last call for comments on comments

 

I’ll throw some Radius/Samba words on the new RC right now.  They will encompass my understanding of the situation, but I make no claims to have perfect knowledge of the subject in any sense of the phrase.

 

Ron

 

From: [] On Behalf Of David Walker
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2014 5:03 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [AD-Assurance] RE: Last call for comments on comments

 

"looks good"

Call tomorrow as the last call?

Davdi

On 02/19/2014 05:07 PM, Eric Goodman wrote:

Okay, perhaps the final edits to the RC are up. In making the edits I varied from the actual language on the comments page (just to maintain language flow), and updated these comments slightly.

 

Also, I need someone else (Ron?) to provide the necessary language about Radius and NTLMv1 in appendix A. This led to minor updates to this page:

 

·         https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/InCAssurance/Draft+responses+to+AD+20140115+public+comments

 

And (sadly) creation of another RC version of the doc at this page (in the workgroup only area of the wiki):

 

·         https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/InCAssurance/InCommon+Silver+with+Active+Directory+Domain+Services+Cookbook+-+RC20140220

 

I know in the previous message I implied “silence equals consent”, but I wouldn’t mind a quick “looks good” if that’s the general thought!

 

--- Eric

 

From: [] On Behalf Of Eric Goodman
Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 9:09 AM
To:
Subject: [AD-Assurance] Last call for comments on comments

 

Yes, we’re looking at comments on comments.

 

Two weeks ago, we closed public comments on the current draft. The current draft and the list of public comments are available here:

 

·         https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/InCAssurance/AD+Silver+Cookbook

 

(Ann, I added a link to the public comments page just now).

 

 

At our meeting that Friday, we looked discussed responses to those comments, which are on a “workgroup only” accessible page here:

 

·         https://spaces.internet2.edu/display/InCAssurance/Draft+responses+to+AD+20140115+public+comments

 

Please review these comments by CoB tomorrow (Wed, Feb 19) so we can make our responses public. Presuming no objections to the comments, I’ll move the responses to the publicly accessible comments page. I’ll also make the edits referred to in this document. Finally, I’ll put together a message to the AAC requesting their review of the Interpretations section.

 

The (perhaps ambitious) goal is to have the whole package out by the end of this week to get the interpretations in front of the AAC for their 2/25 meeting.

 

--- Eric