Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

ad-assurance - [AD-Assurance] [Fwd: NTLMv2 and Kerberos with RC4-HMAC]

Subject: Meeting the InCommon Assurance profile criteria using Active Directory

List archive

[AD-Assurance] [Fwd: NTLMv2 and Kerberos with RC4-HMAC]


Chronological Thread 
  • From: David Walker <>
  • To: InCommon AD Assurance Group <>
  • Cc: DHW <>
  • Subject: [AD-Assurance] [Fwd: NTLMv2 and Kerberos with RC4-HMAC]
  • Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 09:08:58 -0700

I'm all by myself in today's AD Assurance call...  Anyone else going to join?  I'll hang on for another 5 minutes, then figure that our discussion will be postponed to next time.

David

-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: David Walker <>
To: InCommon AD Assurance Group <>
Cc: DHW <>
Subject: NTLMv2 and Kerberos with RC4-HMAC
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 16:27:51 -0700

Two document for discussion in Friday's call...

  • Comments on NTLMv2 and Kerberos with RC4-HMAC - https://spaces.internet2.edu/x/hAlOAg - A document I wrote last May on this topic.  It argued for saying that we don't need an alternative means statement to allow these protocols.
  • Alternative Means for the Use of NTLMv2 and Kerberos with RC4-HMAC - https://spaces.internet2.edu/x/soB2Ag - An alternative means statement if we decide we need it.

David



  • [AD-Assurance] [Fwd: NTLMv2 and Kerberos with RC4-HMAC], David Walker, 08/16/2013

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page