ad-assurance - [AD-Assurance] RE: Detecting NTLM v1 vs. v2 in the event logs - Event 4624
Subject: Meeting the InCommon Assurance profile criteria using Active Directory
List archive
- From: Eric Goodman <>
- To: "" <>
- Subject: [AD-Assurance] RE: Detecting NTLM v1 vs. v2 in the event logs - Event 4624
- Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 17:39:05 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Authentication-results: sfpop-ironport05.merit.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
>We have two domains, ad and ad.local. Don’t ask why.
Yes, that’s generally the kind of question best discussed at the bar after a conference… --- Eric |
- [AD-Assurance] Detecting NTLM v1 vs. v2 in the event logs - Event 4624, Capehart,Jeffrey D, 05/24/2013
- [AD-Assurance] RE: Detecting NTLM v1 vs. v2 in the event logs - Event 4624, Brian Arkills, 05/24/2013
- [AD-Assurance] RE: Detecting NTLM v1 vs. v2 in the event logs - Event 4624, Ron Thielen, 05/24/2013
- [AD-Assurance] RE: Detecting NTLM v1 vs. v2 in the event logs - Event 4624, Eric Goodman, 05/24/2013
- [AD-Assurance] RE: Detecting NTLM v1 vs. v2 in the event logs - Event 4624, Ron Thielen, 05/24/2013
- [AD-Assurance] RE: Detecting NTLM v1 vs. v2 in the event logs - Event 4624, Brian Arkills, 05/24/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.