ad-assurance - Re: [AD-Assurance] NTLMv2 and Kerberos with RC4-HMAC
Subject: Meeting the InCommon Assurance profile criteria using Active Directory
List archive
- From: David Walker <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [AD-Assurance] NTLMv2 and Kerberos with RC4-HMAC
- Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 09:13:13 -0700
- Authentication-results: sfpop-ironport02.merit.edu; dkim=pass (signature verified)
Thanks, Brian. I decided to remove the sentence. David On Mon, 2013-05-20 at 15:43 +0000, Brian Arkills wrote: I think this is pretty accurate. From: [mailto:] On Behalf Of David Walker
|
- [AD-Assurance] NTLMv2 and Kerberos with RC4-HMAC, David Walker, 05/17/2013
- RE: [AD-Assurance] NTLMv2 and Kerberos with RC4-HMAC, Brian Arkills, 05/20/2013
- Re: [AD-Assurance] NTLMv2 and Kerberos with RC4-HMAC, David Walker, 05/20/2013
- Re: [AD-Assurance] NTLMv2 and Kerberos with RC4-HMAC, David Walker, 05/20/2013
- RE: [AD-Assurance] NTLMv2 and Kerberos with RC4-HMAC, Eric Goodman, 05/20/2013
- Re: [AD-Assurance] NTLMv2 and Kerberos with RC4-HMAC, David Walker, 05/20/2013
- RE: [AD-Assurance] NTLMv2 and Kerberos with RC4-HMAC, Michael W. Brogan, 05/20/2013
- RE: [AD-Assurance] NTLMv2 and Kerberos with RC4-HMAC, Eric Goodman, 05/20/2013
- Re: [AD-Assurance] NTLMv2 and Kerberos with RC4-HMAC, David Walker, 05/20/2013
- RE: [AD-Assurance] NTLMv2 and Kerberos with RC4-HMAC, Capehart,Jeffrey D, 05/20/2013
- Re: [AD-Assurance] NTLMv2 and Kerberos with RC4-HMAC, David Walker, 05/20/2013
- RE: [AD-Assurance] NTLMv2 and Kerberos with RC4-HMAC, Capehart,Jeffrey D, 05/20/2013
- Re: [AD-Assurance] NTLMv2 and Kerberos with RC4-HMAC, David Walker, 05/20/2013
- Re: [AD-Assurance] NTLMv2 and Kerberos with RC4-HMAC, David Walker, 05/20/2013
- RE: [AD-Assurance] NTLMv2 and Kerberos with RC4-HMAC, Brian Arkills, 05/20/2013
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.