Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

ad-assurance - Re: [AD-Assurance] Notes from the 5/17/2013 AD Assurance call

Subject: Meeting the InCommon Assurance profile criteria using Active Directory

List archive

Re: [AD-Assurance] Notes from the 5/17/2013 AD Assurance call


Chronological Thread 
  • From: Ann West <>
  • To: "" <>
  • Cc: DHW <>
  • Subject: Re: [AD-Assurance] Notes from the 5/17/2013 AD Assurance call
  • Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 20:03:49 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: sfpop-ironport05.merit.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none

I removed the AIs that I know are completed. 

Here's the updated list:
  • Mark to send out a strawman endorsement statement that the group will iterate on in email.
  • Brian to clarify whether one can tell the difference between NTLM v1 and v2 in the logs. 
  • David to draft an alternative means statement about NTLMv2 and RC4/HMAC.
  • Ron to draft a statement about client caching of credentials.
  • Ron will look into whether SysKey uses approved algorithms.
BTW, Brian and I did contact MS about finding someone else to help and suggested a new person, since our assumption is that Dean Wells will be indisposed for a while.

Ann

From: David Walker <>
Reply-To: "" <>
Date: Friday, May 17, 2013 1:38 PM
To: InCommon AD Assurance Group <>
Cc: David Walker <>
Subject: [AD-Assurance] Notes from the 5/17/2013 AD Assurance call

Everyone,

Quick notes from today's AD Assurance call are on the wiki at:

https://spaces.internet2.edu/x/DwlOAg

David



Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.16.

Top of Page